Visual Studio Installer vs. InstallShield LE vs. WiX

One of the things I’ve been thinking about the ennf Solution I’m working on right now, is how to deliver it to users. I’m a great believer in starting with the build project and the installation project before doing much of the other development things.

The standard delivery method on Windows is MSI. If you snoop around what kind of projects Visual Studio 2010 offers on this you run into three basic options

  1. Visual Studio Installer
  2. InstallShield LE
  3. WiX – Windows Installer XML

All options have trade-offs and the big question is which one to use. Personally, I’ve worked with Visual Studio Installer and WiX before – I haven’t used InstallShield LE. Here a decision help:

  1. Visual Studio Installer
    this is the easiest way to create MSI Packages. The down-side is big though. For one, the Installer is really, really limited in what can be done with it. For anything more than just a simple deployment scenario, you do not want to use this. For another, Microsoft has announced that they will discontinue it and provide it for backward compatibly. Find the article at the Deployment Group Blog
  2. InstallShield LE 
    this one is still easy to work with and unlike the Visual Studio Installer actually works with MS Build, which is important if you want to setup a good build process. Having never used this one myself, I can’t really say much on the pros and cons on this. I suggest checking out the comparison provided by Microsoft on MSDN.
  3. WiX – Windows Installer XML
    originally scheduled to be included in the Visual Studio 2010 package, it was dropped from the delivery build sometime in the beta phase. (Check out the article from Rob Mensching) From my experience, the learning curve for this is pretty high. Because it offers the full possibilities of MSI, the complexity is accordingly high. On top of this, it doesn’t have a nice designer interface. Nonetheless, if you want to take full control, this seems like the best product from my point of view. On the other hand, I’m a perfectionist, I like using the best product regardless of how easy it is to use. For a comparison check out the MSDN article I mentioned before.

One way or another, before you go ahead with creating your setup solution, you should read what Microsoft tells you about the placement of binaries as part of the build process. Lastly, find the WiX Toolset at


3 thoughts on “Visual Studio Installer vs. InstallShield LE vs. WiX

Add yours

    1. Why, because you want to spend more time creating scripts. Using the Professional Version of Installshield can do everything WIX does, better faster easier. People are often misled by the LE version. WIX is very expensive, time wised to use and the learning curve is high. That’s the biggest reason that Microsoft dropped it from being included in the Studio product.

  1. I used InstallShield (not the LE) a couple of years back and it was an awful experience. Of course things might have changed since then, but it was a frighting experience. Bob, you agreed that the LE Version isn’t good and we don’t have to talk about the Visual Studio Installer. Nothing you say contradicts what I mention in the article. If you like Installshield and think it is superior, you can either use my comment section or Blog on it yourself and let me know.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Create a free website or blog at

Up ↑

%d bloggers like this: